Let me just say, I have a number of semi-automatic rifles, some with legal barrels of 16" or greater, but I'd like to get your opinion on using a barrel shorter than 16" ???
For 6.5 Grendel I have a 12" barrel, but I could use a 16" barrel I have. The thing is, I like the 12" barrel better.
I would really like to shoot 8.6 blackout, albeit slightly heavy, it would decimate pigs into jelly. For that matter, it would do the same to black bear.
In Texas, the Garland case granted an injunction to the members of the 2nd Amendment Foundation, as well as the Firearms Policy Coalition, but it's not clear how a pistol brace would stand up in court, so because of that I plan to shoot bolt action rifles this season, while the dust settles on SBRs and Suppressors.
I just wanna know what it would feel like to be Jackie Gleason...cause if I'm ever able to use a suppressor in California, I'll be saying..."How sweet it is!".
What is your guys take on AR type weapons with a pistol brace and 12" barrel in California? This is my Grendel, and as you can see it doesn't have a pistol brace in this pic, and how I currently have it configured. Do you think this is legal in California as an AR pistol? In this pic, it's about 7.7 lbs., ready to hunt. (3.5kg).
I feel this is kind of corny to have the cheek weld on the buffer, but it is legal, AFAIK. Do any of you think this is legal? Also, I have an SB Tactical pistol brace I could put on it, but what is your take on that in regard to legal status in the current climate? The scope is a Vortex Gen1 1-4x24 LVPO.
